The Regional Resilience Journey framework provides task-by-task guidance, including methods,
tools and checklists, to help regions at all maturity levels create or improve their Climate
Resilience Strategies and Action Plans. It applies a systemic approach, just transition and
just resilience principles and harnesses transformative
innovation. Successful strategies
for climate adaptation and transitioning to climate resilience combine interventions across
multiple levers of change in a coherent portfolio of actions, outlining how each
intervention contributes to progress to
wards the desired outcomes.
Key Approaches used in the Regional Resilience Journey
Systems thinking: This approach is designed to help us grasp the
interconnectedness and
interdependencies of our world. It builds from the idea that none of our human
interactions exist in isolation and therefore the changes applied to one part of a given
system can have ripple effects in other parts of that system and those connected.
Transformative Innovation: Innovation is defined as the process of conceiving new
ideas,
methods, practices, or solutions that have the potential to generate a positive impact
and value. For innovation to be transformative, it needs to go a step further in
generating new patterns that create significant and lasting change. Systems thinking is
essential for transformative innovation.
Systems change: It is an intentional process that aims at addressing the root
causes of
complex social and ecological issues that are often embedded in multiple interactions of
cause and effect. It seeks to alter the components and structures that cause systems to
behave in a certain way, with a view to establish new patterns of behaviour.
Portfolio: A portfolio approach shifts attention from the merits of individual
projects
to the potential for integration: facilitating synergies across and between projects to
effect systemic change. The intent is to transform a place by creating an ecosystem of
interventions and/or solutions.
Levers of change: These can be understood as areas of work or entry points for
interventions that have the potential to unlock wide-ranging and positive change in a
given place, industry or both. In the context of climate adaptation, some examples of
powerful levers of change are policy, finance,
technology, and citizen engagement, among
others, especially if the interventions are designed following an innovation approach.
Whole-of-government approach: The approach refers to the joint activities
performed by
diverse ministries, public administrations and public agencies in order to provide a
common solution to particular problems or issues and involve some form of cross-boundary
work.
Multi-level governance: Multi-level governance refers to coordinated actions
across
different levels of governance from the Member States and local and regional authorities
to the European Union, based on partnership and aimed at developing and implementing
common policies.
Transformational climate adaptation: This approach seeks to move beyond reactive
and
incremental adaptation of existing systems. Instead, it seeks fostering systemic shifts
that address the adaptation gap and promote long-term prosperity in the face of climate
change. It delivers place-based transformation by implementing an interrelated portfolio
of interventions across multiple levers of change, to drive significant and lasting
societal change.
Risk-informed decision making: This approach is about making risk management
related
decisions in uncertain, unpredictable environments such as those that a future climate
provides. It is about properly considering risks by building and weighing-up possible
scenarios, consider risk drivers, and trade-offs.
The framework considers various regional circumstances and fosters integrated work on
different
enabling conditions to maximise institutional, social, and financial powers. Acknowledging
the
inter-connectiveness of different fields of work, the transformative perspective aims to
look
beyond climate adaptation and to identify synergies with related sectors (e.g., water
management
, while also strengthening collaboration and multilevel and multistakeholder engagement).
This guidance is designed to support regions in developing transformational Climate
Resilience Strategies and Action Plans, focusing on the first three phases of the Regional
Resilience Journey process.
A systemic approach to accelerating the transition to climate resilience
The Regional Resilience Journey framework promotes transformational adaptation by adopting a
systemic approach that addresses climate resilience in its full complexity, rather than
viewing it as a set of isolated issues. This approach encourages regions and communities to
consider all relevant components and relationships, framing interventions holistically to
shape a desirable future.
By taking a systemic perspective, regions can identify leverage points and incorporate
diverse stakeholder perspectives, balancing short-term disaster risk reduction with
long-term prevention and adaptation while avoiding maladaptation. The Regional Resilience
Journey supports a whole-of-government and multi-level governance approach, breaking down
departmental siloes and fostering meaningful stakeholder engagement at every stage of the
process. This requires a foundation of transdisciplinary knowledge and data to ensure
informed decision-making and collaborative action.
The Regional Resilience Journey fosters an integrated government and multi-level governance
approach to support regions in work beyond departmental siloes, supports meaningful
engagement of stakeholders across all relevant stages of the journey, and requires an
underpinning transdisciplinary knowledge and data.
An iterative and multi-layered process
No transformative adaptation to climate resilience is linear. Therefore, allowing for
experimentation, learning, and continuous iteration is crucial. The Regional Resilience
Journey is designed to accommodate multiple iterations—while the phases follow a sequential
logic, many of the tasks within each phase will run in parallel or in repeated cycles. Over
time, regions are encouraged to undertake parts of the journey, and the journey itself,
multiple times, revisiting assumptions and learning from new insights. Gaps in knowledge,
data, or finance will emerge as different elements are explored, or stakeholders engaged.
Strategically, it will be valuable to undergo iterations with diverse focuses, such as
applying different approaches or zooming in on specific sectors.
Just Climate Resilience
The Regional Resilience Journey is designed to support regions in transitioning to climate
resilience in a just and equitable manner. It integrates principles, processes, and
practices to ensure distributive justice (fair allocation of burden and benefits),
procedural justice (participatory decision-making processes), and recognition (respect and
robust engagement with diverse cultures and perspectives), as defined by the IPCC 2022.
The IPCC stresses that just transitions need targeted and proactive measures to ensure that
any negative social, environmental or economic impacts of economy-wide transitions are
minimised, while benefits are maximised for those disproportionally affected.
The Regional Resilience Journey supports regions in co-designing their adaptation strategies
with a participatory approach, recognising the role that vulnerable populations play in a
just transition. It will help regions in enabling a governance structure that fosters a
meaningful participation of relevant stakeholders (including vulnerable communities), e.g.,
through leveraging innovation engagements, mapping exercises, co-creation, etc.
Financing transformative adaptation
The Regional Resilience Journey approach emphasises the importance of mobilising the
significant investments needed to achieve the transition to climate resilience. This
increasingly demands regions to move from being applicants and recipients of public funds to
being stewards of adaptation capital - leading a financial planning process to scale and
target adaptation finance which makes achieving those regional transformations possible.
Therefore, and in parallel to the main Regional Resilience Journey, we have developed an
Adaptation Investment Cycle to support the development of a Climate Resilience Investment
Plan, which translates the ambitions into bankable
projects.
The process for developing a Climate Resilience Investment Plan has been designed to
encourage the financing of a region’s strategy and pathways in their entirety, whilst
recognising that regions will be starting from different levels of maturity and capability.
The Adaptation Investment Cycle is aligned with the main steps of the Regional Resilience
Journey, meaning that certain inputs are relevant to both. They also intersect at key
stages, particularly in the development and assessment of adaptation options, pathways, and
action plans, where financial viability and economic performance play a crucial role in
determining whether to proceed with various actions. To help clarify these connections, we
have included links throughout the guide to relevant inputs and outputs that support the
development of a Climate Resilience Investment Plan. A full overview of the links between
the two processes can be found in Appendix B. A similar guide is provided in the finance
section, illustrating how the Regional Resilience Journey aligns with the steps in the
Adaptation Investment Cycle.
Phase 1 – Prepare the ground
Figure 5: Phase 1 of the Regional Resilience Journey.
This first phase of the Regional Resilience Journey is to ensure that
you
situate your adaptation planning and already ongoing activities within the
wider policy, social, environmental, economic and fiscal context for an
initial framing of the scope, challenges and opportunities of your regions’
journey to climate resilience. More concretely, this phase is about
preparing the ground by:
- Establishing a baseline: reviewing available knowledge and gaps
of climate impacts and existing political commitments, regional policy,
plans and strategies currently in place and ongoing activities to
address them; and preparing an initial framing of the problem.
- Understanding the system: recognising the relevant parts of the
affected systems, their interrelationships and the drivers of change;
and understanding who are the actors and stakeholders relevant in the
climate adaptation context.
- Assessing risks and capabilities: Based on the aforementioned
points, gaining a clear understanding of the current and future climate
risks for your region that would need to be addressed to become climate
resilient; and assessing the capabilities of your region needed to
manage this transition.
By preparing the ground, you will gather essential information on your
climate challenges, vulnerabilities, and risks, gain an initial
understanding of the conditions that enable or hinder resilience, and
identify key ecosystem actors to engage with for refining the diagnosis and
evidence base. You will also have gained an overview of ongoing activities
that build on, mobilise the necessary resources and knowledge, and enable a
co-creative environment for the development of the Climate Resilience
Strategies.
The output of this phase could be envisaged as a baseline
report. This
baseline report could cover key elements of the ‘preparing the ground’
phase, including in particular:
- An assessment of current and predicted future climate risks and
vulnerabilities, including a prioritisation of the key and most urgent
ones.
- A description of the different sectors, including key community systems
involved and impacted by the transition to climate resilience, including
their relationships, key interdependencies and cascading effects;
economic, social and ecological drivers and consequences; as well as
policies impacting and impacted by climate risks and regional resilience
maturity.
- An assessment of adaptive capacities,
competences and resources relevant
for achieving a just transition to climate resilience, including a list
of needs that should be addressed as a matter of priority, for example
with regard to key enabling conditions.
- A map of stakeholders, vulnerable groups and inequities, including a
stakeholder assessment matrix mapping the interest and influence of each
target group, and their impact in regional resilience; a stakeholder
profile to identify their mandate, field of action and strategic
interrelations; an influence map to scope out the impact of the project
in the regional communities.
Links to the Adaptation Investment Cycle while preparing the ground:
During this phase, the important interlinkages to be considered between the
Adaptation Investment Cycle and the Regional Resilience Journey are
described in Table 2.
Table 2: Linkages between the Regional Resilience Journey and the
Adaptation Investment Cycle during Phase 1, including relevant inputs
and outputs.
Regional Resilience Journey Phases and Tasks |
Relevant Adaptation Investment Cycle inputs |
Outputs relevant to Adaptation Investment Cycle inputs |
Phase 1: Prepare the ground |
Task 1.1 Establish a baseline |
Summary of the existing policy objectives, headline budget
(Adaptation Investment Cycle Task 1.1),
as well as evidence of current and future costs (Adaptation
Investment Cycle Task 1.2) are both relevant.
|
The economic and financial aspects of data collected will
feed into the evidence base and rationale
(Adaptation Investment Cycle Task 1.3).
|
Task 1.2 Understand the system |
Preparatory work to develop an Investment Plan, including
governance and stakeholder engagement
with engaging stakeholders.
|
Conceptual maps can be used to understand system context and
identify priorities,
which can inform the approach to scenario building.
|
Task 1.3 Assess risks and vulnerabilities |
Studies and evidence identified or developed in Adaptation
Investment Cycle Task 1.2 for the risk
and vulnerability inputs.
|
The risk and vulnerability assessment results will help to
support investment decision making.
|
Establish a baseline
This task involves collecting evidence to evaluate a region’s
climate risks, vulnerabilities, and current climate risk
management capabilities. Key activities include reviewing
climate impact studies, adaptation measures, disaster risk
reduction efforts, historical cost of disasters, policies,
strategies, budgets, resources, and institutional
frameworks.
The task is critical for effective climate adaptation
planning, enabling stakeholders to assess the direct and
indirect impacts of climate risks on various sectors. This
process establishes a solid factual basis to inform
subsequent stages of the Regional Resilience Journey and
identifies gaps in data and knowledge that should be
addressed through further research and innovation.
To complete this task:
- Develop a data collection plan:
Identify data needs, sources, methods, resources, roles,
and timelines for gathering and organising data.
- Collect historical data and
information: Compile data on past climate
events, impacts, and socio-economic and environmental
dynamics. Engage stakeholders to enrich the evidence
base with diverse insights.
- Identify relevant frameworks: Identify
relevant legal, fiscal, institutional, and operational
frameworks, including policies and legislation
addressing climate risks.
- Analyse evidence: Synthesise collected
data, identify gaps requiring additional research, and
extract key insights to outline the region’s adaptation
and resilience needs.
This task involves defining and specifying an initial common
and agreed set of problem statements and decision-making
frameworks (for example, assessment and evaluation criteria)
against which to formulate the climate adaptation pathways
and innovation portfolio.
Proper problem framing ensures clarity on what the Climate
Resilience Strategy aims to achieve, transitioning
discussions from vague ambitions to actionable goals with
measurable outcomes. It helps build consensus and legitimacy
among stakeholders, fostering engagement throughout the
Regional Resilience Journey. Risk-based problem framing also
supports the formulation of adaptation pathways (see Task
3.2.1) by considering the evolution of climate risks, system
vulnerabilities, and uncertainties in timing and magnitude.
To complete this task:
- Review evidence and system
understanding: Reflect on data, underlying
causes, and resilience needs, building on Task 1.1.1 and
Task 1.2.1.
- Formulate initial set of problem
statements: Define and prioritise specific
challenges impacting key community systems.
- Formulate initial set of planning
objectives: Specify objectives addressing
climate risks and fostering broader resilience goals.
- Identify initial set of performance
metrics: Establish measurable criteria to
evaluate adaptation options and pathways.
- Set boundary conditions: Define
constraints like time horizons, geographic scope, and
system boundaries to guide planning.
Understand the system
This task uses systems thinking to create a shared
understanding of the regional system's components,
functions, and interactions that influence climate
resilience. It focuses on mapping the system holistically,
identifying relationships within and between key community
systems, and prioritizing climate hazards, their drivers,
and potential risks.
By organizing system components into a comprehensive map, the
task highlights dependencies, feedback loops, and potential
opportunities or barriers for improving resilience. It also
examines cascading and indirect effects, stakeholder roles,
and processes that could benefit from enhanced enabling
conditions.
To complete this task:
- Identify system boundaries: Define and
prioritise
relevant hazards, key systems, and subsystems,
considering physical, socio-economic, ecological, and
institutional factors.
- Map relevant systems: Use spatial and
conceptual tools
to visualise system components, relationships, feedback
loops, and barriers, identifying drivers of risk and
potential intervention points.
- Consider cascading effects: Analyse
indirect and
compounding effects of climate hazards throughout the
system.
- Examine stakeholder roles: Map
stakeholder contributions
and influences to identify areas for collaboration and
innovation.
This task is about identifying and analysing stakeholders
essential to developing and implementing your Climate
Resilience Strategy. It emphasises mapping stakeholders’
power dynamics, their influence on planning, and their role
in building system resilience. Special attention is given to
vulnerable groups and existing inequities, recognising that
climate impacts and adaptation measures can
disproportionately affect certain populations. The task aims
for inclusivity, ensuring no stakeholder is overlooked and
critical actors, such as potential ambassadors, are
identified. The stakeholder mapping process is
collaborative, involving staff from various departments and
refining the analysis over time.
To complete this task:
- Identify all potential stakeholders:
Build a stakeholder
map using insights from the systems map (Task 1.2.1) and
include relevant sectors and groups.
- Assess and prioritising stakeholders:
Use a stakeholder
assessment matrix to evaluate stakeholders’ interest,
influence, and engagement needs.
- Develop stakeholder profiles: Create
detailed
stakeholder profiles analysing power dynamics,
responsibilities, and roles to guide engagement
strategies.
Assess risks & vulnerabilities
This task focuses on conducting a Climate Risk Assessment
(CRA) to understand the current and future climate risks
relevant to your region.
It involves three main phases:
- Risk identification, which pinpoints significant hazards
and associated risks;
- Risk analysis, which examines the magnitude and
likelihood of these risks;
- Risk evaluation, which prioritises risks based on
urgency, severity, and the region's adaptive capacity.
The task also includes determining methodologies, collecting
data, and developing scenarios to enhance the assessment's
accuracy and applicability.
To complete this task:
- Identify risks: Use baseline data, stakeholder input,
and existing studies to identify hazards and risks,
considering both current and future scenarios.
- Analyse risks: Apply the chosen methodology to assess
magnitude and likelihood of risks, analyse system
interdependencies (cascading impacts), and identify
critical points for intervention.
- Evaluate risks: Prioritize risks by evaluating their
impact, urgency, and adaptive capacity.
Associated activities:
- Formulate a risk assessment methodology (quantitative,
qualitative, or semi-quantitative).
- Collect or generate supplementary data to refine the
assessment.
- Develop scenarios based on system mapping and
prioritised risk drivers.
This task focuses on evaluating and monitoring the
capabilities required to implement a Climate Resilience
Strategy and support your region’s transition toward
resilience. The objective is to identify the regional
readiness for transformative adaptation and highlight areas
for improvement. This process involves determining current
resilience capabilities, identify gaps, and develop a
roadmap to address them. The insights gained enable a
targeted approach to strengthening resilience capacities,
ensuring efficient use of resources and fostering
collaboration among stakeholders.
To complete this task:
- Measure baseline resilience capacity:
Use the
self-assessment questionnaire to assess your regional
resilience capacity and readiness for the Regional
Resilience Journey.
- Identify resilience gaps: Pinpoint
areas needing
improvement.
- Identify key enabling conditions to
leverage: Determine
conditions to enhance public policy innovation.
- Develop a roadmap to enhance resilience
maturity: Plan
capacity-building activities and set performance
criteria.
- Share outcomes with stakeholders:
Foster collaboration
through shared understanding and dialogue.
Phase 2 – Build a shared vision
Figure 7: Phase 2 of the Regional Resilience Journey.
A critical step of your region’s journey to climate resilience is
co-developing a shared vision of your region’s future climate resilient
state together with stakeholders. This vision will guide your later
activities to formulate your long-term Climate Resilient Strategy and Action
Plan, and serves as the beacon towards which your region is heading.
This second phase is about building a shared vision by:
- Ensuring ownership and commitment: Developing strategies for
meaningful and active engagement of relevant actors in the various tasks
and outlining a decision-making process within your respective policy
processes and political contexts leading to adoption of the Climate
Resilience Strategy, Action Plan, and Investment Plans.
- Exploring possible climate resilient futures: Climate resilience
can
possibly be achieved by a range of different paths. Reflecting about
possible different climate resilient futures is about exploring
different and potentially transformational ways in which your region
could choose to live under the evolving climatic conditions.
- Co-creating a shared vision: Building on the preparatory work
completed in Phase 1, elaborating a common understanding of an
ambitious, transformative, yet possible future for your region, which
lays the ground for a cohesive narrative and clear sense of purpose and
direction for the transition to climate resilience.
- Developing a theory of change: Giving more detail to your vision
by
reflecting on how change is supposed to happen, and to better understand
and agree on the commitments and systemic changes that your region is
willing to take to achieve that vision.
Meaningful and active engagement of relevant actors in the process of
building a shared vision is critical to creating ownership of and commitment
to both the process and vision. Exploring possible futures generates
positive narratives and leads to a shared understanding of what a just
climate transition should entail for the region, while identifying
regionally specific potentials and levers of change. The co-created vision
serves both as a mobilizing tool and a reference to keep regional
stakeholders accountable.
The outputs of this phase will provide key elements of your Climate
Resilience Strategy, including:
- A shared vision of the climate resilient future that the region wants to
achieve, providing a compelling, engaged, co-created narrative that
should allow you to mobilise stakeholders in your region required to
implement and sustain your plan.
- A co-developed stakeholder engagement strategy and participatory design
process, including the description of engagement mechanisms and
structures. These can be planned or already established and should be
linked to the key enabling conditions.
- An overview of identified regional transformation potentials and
possible climate resilient futures, including the key enabling
conditions that regions and communities would need to address and
strengthen (building on the baseline
assessment).
Links to the Adaptation Investment Cycle: During this phase, the
important
interlinkages to be considered between the Adaptation Investment Cycle and
the Regional Resilience Journey are described in Table .
Table 3: Linkages between the Regional Resilience Journey and the
Adaptation Investment Cycle during Phase 2, including relevant inputs
and outputs.
Regional Resilience Journey Phases and Tasks |
Relevant Adaptation Investment Cycle inputs |
Outputs relevant to Adaptation Investment Cycle |
Phase 2: Build a shared vision |
Task 2.1: Ensure ownership
and alignment
|
Preparatory work to develop an Investment Plan, including
governance
and stakeholder engagement approach can help with
identifying
and refining objectives.
|
Commitment of relevant stakeholders.
|
Task 2.2: Explore possible
futures
|
Evidence identified in Adaptation Investment Cycle Task 1.3
on short
and future risks should help shape future developments.
|
The more detailed possible futures can also help inform the
selection
and expansion of future finance sources and instruments in
Adaptation
Investment Cycle Task 2.2 and 2.3.
|
Task 2.3: Co-create a
transition to climate resilience
|
Cycle Task 2.2, as well as the changes to enabling
conditions
that are needed to achieve them can feed into the vision
process
(setting it in Task 3.1).
|
They will also be useful to help inform the selection and
expansion
of future finance sources and instruments in Adaptation
Investment
Cycle Task 2.2. They will also be useful to inform the
approach
to scenario building in Adaptation Investment Cycle Task
3.1.
|
Task 2.4: Develop a theory
of change
|
Regions may wish to use the additional sources of finance
and/or
instruments the region identifies in Adaptation Investment
Cycle
Task 2.2, as well as the changes to enabling conditions that
are needed to achieve them to develop a dedicated strand for
finance in both the short and long term, and in the
priorities
for innovation portfolios.
|
This will be useful to help inform the selection and
expansion
of future finance sources and instruments in Adaptation
Investment
Cycle Task 2.2 and 2.3. It will also be useful for framing
the
longlisting of options in Adaptation Investment Cycle Task
3.1
by setting out the broad framing for the pathways.
|
Ensure ownership & commitment
This task focuses on obtaining high-level political
endorsement and commitment for the development and
implementation of your Climate Resilience Strategy and
Investment Plan. It involves integrating resilience goals
into broader policy areas by coordinating with governmental
initiatives, aligning policies across departments, and
harmonising adaptation objectives. It aims to foster a
whole-of-government approach by engaging local, regional,
and national stakeholders, addressing policy obstacles, and
leveraging opportunities identified in legal and
institutional frameworks, also beyond the regional level.
This includes establishing a strategic connection between
your resilience efforts and existing policy structures.
To complete this task:
- Understand your current policy mix: Map
relevant policies, strategies, and programmes at EU,
national, regional, and local levels, identifying
alignment and reform needs.
- Identify entry points to policy
cycles: Pinpoint stages in policy cycles
for presenting Regional Resilience Journey outputs.
- Map relevant bureaucratic
processes: Clarify administrative steps and
key decision-makers required for strategy endorsement.
- Develop an initial policy roadmap: Plan
the integration of your strategy across varying
interests and policy alignments.
The following activities should take place continuously along
your journey:
- Engage, communicate, and collaborate with
colleagues at
the identified departments and/or
agencies: Communicate
with stakeholders, arrange information sessions, and
build ambassador support within departments. Use science
and evidence to support your statements, building on the
knowledge you gathered at the beginning of your journey.
- Arrange meetings with political
representatives: Discuss
resilience goals with political representatives,
highlighting regional challenges and bottlenecks.
Capitalise on the engagement of key stakeholders, by
demonstrating broad interest and participation in
thematic activities.
- Establish partnerships: Create or use
forums for
multi-level collaboration with other regions, national
ministries, and research institutions.
- Secure explicit commitments: Obtain
letters of intent,
formal endorsements, or signatories to showcase support.
This task focuses on creating and executing a comprehensive
stakeholder engagement strategy to guide participation
throughout the Regional Resilience Journey. It defines how
and when various stakeholder groups will be involved —
whether in co-creation, consultation, validation, or
information-sharing — and outlines the methods, channels,
and timing for engagement. Engaging stakeholders
meaningfully is essential for building ownership, trust, and
commitment to the Climate Resilience Strategy.
To complete this task:
Co-develop a stakeholder engagement strategy:
- Identify stakeholders, their roles, and objectives.
- Define participation processes for each output
(e.g., vision, action plan).
- Specify tools, channels, logistical arrangements,
and support mechanisms.
- Establish timelines for stakeholder involvement.
- Include principles for equitable participation and
conflict resolution.
- Develop a communications strategy to raise public
awareness.
Implement the strategy:
- Create “safe spaces” for inclusive discussion and
collaboration with neutral facilitators.
- Establish participatory mechanisms (e.g., citizen
assemblies, advisory committees, or community hubs).
- Raise awareness through workshops and communication
materials.
- Engage regional stakeholders in decision-making and
adaptation efforts, fostering continuous
collaboration.
Explore possible futures:
This task involves exploring alternative desirable futures
for your region considering its potential climate risks. It
aims to stimulate stakeholder thinking about what the future
could look like, beyond the conventional climate adaptation
strategies, to encompass climate resilience as a central
organising principle. These futures are narrative
descriptions that integrate social, ecological, and
technical dimensions, and represent desirable outcomes that
address key challenges in your region, including climate
resilience.
Unlike risk-based scenarios, this task focuses on how your
region could adapt to varying conditions, not just the risks
it faces. Involve a diverse group of stakeholders in the
process, including vulnerable groups, youth, the private
sector, and the public sector, to ensure comprehensive
perspectives.
To complete this task:
- Agree on challenges that your futures need to address so
that these would be considered desirable: Identify which
challenges your future scenarios must address (e.g.,
climate risk, inequality, regional development).
- Understand what is already changing and how these
changes affect your region’s future: Identify emergent
changes, both local and global, that could influence
your region’s future.
- Select relevant changes to explore possible
futures: Choose the most impactful changes and drivers
to explore, ensuring at least one climate driver is
included.
- Identify levers of change for each desirable
future: Determine the key factors that would enable your
region to reach each desirable future.
- Develop narratives/visuals representing the selected
futures: Create short descriptions and visuals
representing selected futures, highlighting social,
ecological, and technical features.
Co-create a shared vision for the transition to climate resilience
This task focuses on the co-creation of a shared vision for
your region’s transition to climate resilience. It involves
a wide participatory process to align on a common
understanding of the desired future and the changes needed
to achieve it.
The vision should be ambitious, transformative, and
realistic, specifying a clear timeframe for its realization.
This task sets the stage for broader engagement activities
and helps align stakeholders on the region’s climate
resilience journey. It also serves as a key moment for
decision-making, ensuring that stakeholder priorities are
represented in the development of the strategy.
A shared vision is essential for creating a cohesive
narrative and a unified direction for the region. It
provides the foundation for the Climate Resilience Strategy,
including adaptation pathways and the investment plan.
To complete this task:
Contextualise: Set the stage for your
stakeholders by
explaining the process, goals, and expected outcomes,
aligning them on prior work done (e.g., climate risk
assessments).
Co-develop the vision:
- Develop guiding principles for decision-making and
prioritization.
- Debate and agree on a shared vision, based on
desirable futures and stakeholder preferences.
- Create a narrative and visual elements that reflect
the social, ecological, and technological aspects of
the vision.
Communicate the vision: Spread the
vision through
campaigns, events, and international conferences. Gather
support by collecting signatories and promoting the
vision widely.
Develop a theory of change
This task focuses on understanding the broad systemic changes
required to achieve your region’s climate resilience vision.
It helps identify and agree on the changes needed across
different sectors, as well as the assumptions underlying
these changes. The task does not focus on specific
activities but rather on understanding the chains of
outcomes and how stakeholders may respond to these changes.
It clarifies dependencies, needs, and weaknesses in the
vision, providing insight into the transition toward
resilience in the short-, medium-, and long-term. This task
makes the level of ambition and commitment required from
regional stakeholders explicit.
To complete this task:
Define broad systemic changes and high-level
outcomes:
- Revisit the vision and system map to frame the
required changes.
- Identify and describe the longer-term, mid-term, and
short-term changes as outcomes.
- Analyse the changes, ensuring all sectors and
stakeholder groups are covered, and consider
potential conflicts.
- Identify assumptions (positive enablers or risks)
that may influence these changes.
Align these changes with principles and planning
objectives:
- Cross-check the outcomes with guiding principles,
planning objectives, and performance metrics.
- Share the aligned outcomes, assumptions, principles,
and objectives with stakeholders through simplified
diagrams and narratives.
Phase 3 – Design Pathways
Figure 8: Phase 3 of the Regional Resilience Journey.
The third phase of the Regional Resilience Journey focuses on turning your
vision into actionable climate adaptation pathways. Designing these pathways
involves:
- Identifying and assessing options: Exploring a wide range of
potential
adaptation options to reduce risks and
achieve the vision, while
evaluating their applicability, performance against risks, overall
benefits, adverse effects, trade-offs, and synergies.
- Designing a portfolio of interventions: Formulating adaptation
pathways to realise your region’s shared vision by sequencing
prioritised options over time, identifying key decision points, and
selecting a diverse array of innovations—from technical solutions to
institutional, social, and behavioural changes—to create comprehensive
climate resilience strategies.
- Preparing for implementation: Once the Climate Resilience
Strategy is
in place, a detailed Action Plan must be developed to guide
implementation over the next three to five years, alongside a
Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning Plan to track progress, encourage
learning, and allow for adjustment.
Climate Resilient Strategies to both adapt to climate change and transition
towards resilience bring together interventions across multiple levers of
change in a coherent portfolio of actions, outlining how each intervention
contributes towards the desired vision. These strategies rely upon
structured and evidence-based decision-making—supported by monitoring—that
ensures efforts align with the overarching shared vision and that their
activities, outputs and outcomes can be prioritised and sequenced over time.
Your Climate Resilience Strategy is rooted in your Theory of Change, which
outlines how and why the desired transformations will occur, based on a set
of agreed assumptions. From this foundation, specific adaptation options and
innovative actions can be identified to meet both your region’s adaptation
and resilience objectives. Climate adaptation pathways are designed to
include a sufficient range of options to achieve long-term transformational
goals, complemented by an innovation portfolio to both enable these and
enhance overall system resilience. Co-creation of your Climate Resilience
Strategy brings together existing policies and new or accelerated
interventions into a transformative action plan aligned with your shared
vision.
Stakeholder involvement is critical to this process. It refines and
validates
the adaptation options and pathways, fosters ownership and support for the
actions within the Climate Resilience Strategy, and ensures accountability
to the co-created vision established in earlier phases.
A well-designed Climate Resilience Strategy delivers early wins that mitigate
risks and contribute to long-term resilience and societal transformation. It
must also balance these immediate successes with future uncertainties,
incorporating innovative experiments to generate insights for future
decisions. This process should be guided by an iterative, continuously
improving Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning framework to ensure ongoing
adaptation and refinement.
The outputs of this phase contribute the final key elements to
build your
Climate Resilience Strategy and Action Plan, including:
- A description of the climate adaptation pathways, outlining a sequence
of actions drawn from a range of adaptation options. This should include
an assessment of the effectiveness of identified options and their needs
in terms of enabling conditions.
- A description of the short-term and mid-term activities that the
region will conduct to implement its adaptation strategy, including
priority of these actions, roles, responsibilities, and resources.
- A monitoring, evaluation and learning framework for implementing the
action plan, adaptation pathways, and investment plan. This should
include a description of how different actions contribute to the desired
outcomes and changes and identify how to monitor progress.
- A portfolio of innovation actions) in support of the adaptation
pathways.
- Links to the Adaptation Investment Cycle: During this phase, the
important interlinkages to be considered between the Adaptation
Investment Cycle and the Regional Resilience Journey are described
below.
Table 4: Linkages between the Regional Resilience Journey and the
Adaptation Investment Cycle during Phase 3, including relevant inputs
and outputs.
Regional Resilience Journey Phases and Tasks |
Relevant Adaptation Investment Cycle inputs |
Outputs relevant to Adaptation Investment Cycle |
Phase 3: Design pathways |
Task 3.1: Identify and
assess options
|
This task is undertaken in parallel with Adaptation
Investment Cycle Task 3.1.
The co-creation approach here is used to feed into the
broader evaluation.
|
The options identified in this Task are also those used in
Adaptation Investment Cycle Task 3.1, to help assess
benefits. They can be used as options in Task 3.2 to help
inform the sequencing approach.
|
Task 3.2: Co-design a
portfolio of interventions
|
The assessment of adaptation options and sequencing in
Adaptation Investment Cycle Task 3.2 can be used as an input
into the formulation and evaluation of pathways. The
barriers to new financing options in Adaptation Investment
Cycle Task 2.2 can be used to shape priorities for financial
innovation in the innovation portfolio.
|
The formulation and evaluation of pathways can be used as
inputs into the sequencing from adaptation and economic
perspectives in Adaptation Investment Cycle Task 3.2.
|
Task 3.3: Preparing for
implementation
|
The pipeline of bankable priorities, as well as the actions
identified to improve the enabling conditions for adaptation
finance (Adaptation Investment Cycle Task 4.3) should be
included in the action plan. Task 4.1 of the Adaptation
Investment Cycle will also ensure that each action has a
strong economic case that meets the region’s financing
requirements, whilst Task 4.2 will ensure that each action
has an agreed financing approach.
|
The action plan of actions can be used as checklist to help
build the economic and financial cases in Adaptation
Investment Cycle task 4.1, as well as to confirm financial
models for each action are in place as in Adaptation
Investment Cycle Task 4.2.
|
Identify and assess options for adaptation pathways
This task involves identifying a wide range of adaptation
options that can reduce risks and help achieve the
desired
outcomes. It includes researching best practices from
similar regions and engaging with stakeholders to gather
diverse ideas.
The goal is to create a portfolio of adaptation options
that
offers flexibility and resilience in addressing climate
challenges while addressing the underlying drivers of
risk
and vulnerability. These options may include
technological,
informational, nature-based, community-based, financial,
governance-related, behavioural, and structural
interventions.
The task emphasises considering options across various
levels
(individual, regional, national) and sectors to better
understand potential interventions for your region. By
exploring multiple approaches, you can identify the most
effective interventions, balance traditional and
innovative
methods, and consider local expertise.
To complete this task:
- Research potential interventions:
Study
successful climate adaptation strategies from
similar
regions and review relevant case studies, scientific
research, and best practices.
- Co-create with stakeholders: Engage
local communities, experts, and policymakers in
co-creation workshops to gather diverse perspectives
on
potential options.
- Adopt a systemic perspective: Focus
on
interconnected, multi-functional interventions that
address both direct and indirect climate risks.
- Categorise and screen: Create an
inventory of adaptation options, categorizing them
by
scale, type, sector, and timeframe, ensuring
alignment
with your region’s objectives and capacity.
This task focuses on evaluating the effectiveness,
applicability, and potential performance of each
identified
adaptation option against climate risks, considering
benefits, trade-offs, and synergies. It involves
assessing
how well these options align with planning objectives
and
their capacity to drive systemic change.
Guided by the Theory of Change, the task identifies the
conditions needed for successful implementation and
provides
insights into what works, why it works, and what
resources
are required. This analysis forms the foundation for
crafting effective adaptation pathways and innovation
portfolios.
Assessing adaptation options is vital for selecting
strategies that not only mitigate climate risks but also
contribute to broader societal goals, such as economic
development, social well-being, and public health. By
prioritising options with multiple benefits and minimal
adverse effects, the process ensures alignment with
regional
policy goals and stakeholder expectations.
To complete this task:
- Establish evaluation criteria:
Define
criteria for
assessing performance, feasibility, and
transformative
potential, ensuring alignment with regional goals.
- Conduct feasibility studies:
Evaluate
technical,
economic, social, and environmental feasibility.
- Analyse opportunities: Assess
enabling
conditions for
future feasibility and impact.
- Stakeholder review and validation:
Engage stakeholders
for feedback and alignment with their needs.
- Prioritise options: Rank options
based
on benefits,
feasibility, and transformative power.
Co-design a portfolio of interventions
This task focuses on creating adaptation pathways to
achieve
your region’s climate-resilient vision (Task 2.3.1). It
involves sequencing prioritised adaptation options (Task
3.1.2) over time and identifying key adaptation decision
moments. Pathways ensure flexibility, allowing for
adjustments as conditions evolve.
Short-term actions should leave future options open,
enabling
a scalable response to changing climate and
socioeconomic
conditions. Key activities include selecting and
sequencing
low-regret options, identifying adaptation limits, and
iteratively building pathways to address risks over
short-,
medium-, and long-term time horizons. Formulating
adaptation
pathways supports proactive, flexible, and robust
long-term
planning under uncertain future conditions to avoid
maladaptation and stimulate transformation.
To complete this task:
- Characterise promising options:
Categorise prioritised options as short-, medium-,
or
long-term based on timing, effectiveness,
feasibility,
and costs/benefits.
- Identify potential adaptation
limits:
Define the conditions under which options may no
longer
achieve adaptation objectives.
- Explore combinations of options:
Build
logical combinations of short-, medium-, and
long-term
options to create pathways.
- Visualise pathways alternatives:
Use
tools like tables or metro maps to illustrate
pathways
and identify key decision moments.
This task focuses on evaluating the adaptation pathways
developed in Task 3.2.1 to assess their capacity to
deliver
broader resilience goals and ensure they are flexible,
feasible, robust, and effective. It aims to identify
pathways that align with the region’s shared vision
(Task
2.3.1) and Theory of Change (Task 2.4.1) while
performing
well under planning uncertainties.
The evaluation process prioritises a manageable number of
pathways that best achieve both adaptation and broader
resilience goals. Stakeholder engagement is integral to
the
evaluation, fostering alignment and ownership over the
selected pathways.
To complete this task:
- Select an evaluation methodology and
criteria: Use approaches like
Multi-Criteria Analysis, Cost-Benefit Analysis, or
Social Return on Investment to assess pathway
performance. Criteria should address broader
resilience
objectives and implementation factors.
- Evaluate pathway performance:
Assess
alternatives against the criteria to identify
synergies,
trade-offs, and performance outcomes.
- Rank pathways: Aggregate results to
rank pathways based on their comparative
effectiveness.
- Select and visualise preferred
pathways: Highlight the best-performing
pathways in a simplified pathways map for inclusion
in
the Climate Resilience Strategy.
This task involves creating a portfolio of innovation
actions
to support and accelerate the implementation of your
adaptation pathways. These innovations encompass
technical,
social, institutional, and behavioural changes, aiming
to
enhance climate resilience through a holistic,
whole-of-system approach.
Unlike adaptation options, innovation actions complement
and
enable pathways without directly addressing risks. The
resulting portfolio, aligned with the region’s shared
vision
(Task 2.3.1) and Theory of Change (Task 2.3.2),
integrates
innovation policies, skills development, and regulatory
adjustments. The portfolio evolves iteratively, being
refined based on performance metrics and new insights.
To complete this task:
- Identify innovation actions: Build
your
portfolio by identifying actions aligned with your
adaptation pathways through open calls and
collaborative, multi-stakeholder workshops. Focus on
synergies and appropriate composition.
- Assess portfolio quality: Evaluate
the
portfolio using criteria like scalability
(amplification
potential), synergies (pooled resources and
cost-efficiency), and risk vs. return (balancing
quick
wins and long-term transformation).
- Communicate the portfolio: Clearly
articulate the portfolio’s goals and management
strategies to stakeholders for broad alignment and
support.
Preparing for implementation
This task involves translating the near-term actions from
your Climate Resilience Strategy into a concrete action
plan. While the strategy outlines long-term goals,
visions,
and adaptation pathways, the action plan provides a
detailed
roadmap for short-term implementation, focusing on
activities, required resources, responsibilities, and
timelines.
It prioritises activities, identifies enabling conditions
(e.g., policy changes or stakeholder engagement), and
defines performance indicators to ensure alignment with
your
vision and Theory of Change. Action plans are iterative,
evolving with strategy progress and stakeholder input.
By
providing a clear, actionable framework, the plan
enhances
resource mobilisation, supports stakeholder engagement,
and
ensures the feasibility of short-term and long-term
objectives.
To complete this task:
- Identify short-term actions:
Define
actions needed
within 1-5 years, covering immediate measures and
enabling conditions (e.g., policy updates,
stakeholder
engagement, behaviour change).
- Prioritise actions: Use criteria
like
costs, benefits,
impacts, and dependencies to rank and categorise
actions
for balanced implementation.
- Integrate into policy mix: Align
actions with broader
policies, identify involved agencies, and ensure
multi-level governance.
- Publish and disseminate the action
plan: Clearly
present actions with timing, mainstreaming
strategies,
financing approaches, and key performance
indicators.
Ensure political support and communicate the plan
broadly.
This task involves creating a MEL plan for your Climate
Resilience Strategy and Action Plan to ensure effective
implementation, assess outcomes, and adapt strategies as
needed. The MEL plan operates at two levels: strategic,
focusing on long-term objectives and guiding principles,
and
operational, addressing short-term goals and actions. It
provides accountability to stakeholders and integrates
learning cycles to evaluate progress, identify
challenges,
and adapt to new circumstances.
By combining monitoring, evaluation, and learning, the
MEL
plan ensures continuous improvement and alignment with
your
climate resilience vision. For regions relying on
external
funding, MEL plans demonstrate impact, increasing access
to
finance and aligning with requirements like the EU
Taxonomy
on Sustainable Finance.
To complete this task:
- Define your audience and purpose:
Identify
stakeholders, reporting cycles, and participants in
learning processes.
- Establish a baseline : Assess the
current regional
context using Phase 1 data and additional relevant
information.
Strategic MEL:
- Monitor guiding principles, results, and
outcomes.
- Track adaptation pathways to identify
approaching
challenges, limits, and opportunities.
- Use data and contextual observations for
adaptive
management.
Operational MEL:
- Monitor key milestones and outputs for the
Action
Plan.
- Evaluate the Innovation Portfolio for outcomes
and
governance.
- Track financial aspects of the Investment Plan,
including funding mobilization and use of
proceeds.
- Communicate the MEL plan: Share
with
stakeholders,
incorporate feedback, and ensure clarity and
relevance
in the process.
Before embarking on your Regional Resilience Journey, take time to
reflect on
the outputs you aim to produce as part of your Climate Resilience
Strategy.
We suggest the following:
A Climate Resilience Baseline
Assessment drawing on key elements of
the ‘Prepare the ground’ phase, including in particular:
- An assessment of current and predicted future climate risks and
vulnerabilities, including a prioritisation of the key and most
urgent ones.
- A description of the different sectors and community systems
impacted by the transition to climate resilience, including
interdependencies and cascading effects.
- An assessment of adaptive capacities,
competences and resources
relevant for achieving a just transition to climate resilience,
including a list of needs that should be addressed as a matter
of
priority.
- A map of stakeholders, vulnerable groups and inequities,
including
a stakeholder assessment matrix mapping the interest and
influence
of each target group, and their impact in regional resilience.
A Climate Resilience Strategy drawing on key elements of the
‘build a
shared vision’ phase as the ‘design pathways’ phase, including:
- A shared vision of the climate resilient future that the region
wants to achieve, providing a compelling, engaged, co-created
narrative that allows you to mobilise the stakeholders in your
region required to implement and sustain your plan.
- An overview of identified regional transformation potentials and
possible climate resilient futures, including the key enabling
conditions that regions and communities would need to
address and
strengthen.
- A set of preferred climate adaptation
pathways, outlining strategic
sequences of preferred adaptation options to be implemented
against
a long-term time horizon as risk-based conditions continue to
change.
- A co-developed stakeholder engagement strategy and participatory
designpeer process, including the description of engagement
mechanisms and structures.
A Climate Resilience Action Plan covering key elements of the
‘design
pathways’ phase, including:
- A description of the near-term that the region will conduct to
implement its adaptation strategy, including priority of these
actions, roles, responsibilities, and resources.
- A monitoring, evaluation and learning framework for implementing
the
action plan, adaptation pathways, and investment plan.
- An innovation portfolio, outlining a
set of innovation activities
that support the adaptation pathways.
A Climate Resilience Investment Plan
which translates the shared vision
into a pipeline of bankable projects, ensuring the resources are
available to deliver the climate resilience strategy and action plan
(see guidance on the Adaptation Investment Cycle on this). Its key
components include:
- A summary of the investment context in your region, including an
assessment of current and future costs, and the relevant
investment
processes and criteria.
- A catalogue of existing sources and instruments in your region
to
finance adaptation and future options you are planning to
explore.
- A series of investment strategies for the adaptation pathways
developed in your climate resilience strategy.
A pipeline of bankable projects associated with the action plan, along
with
actions to improve the enabling conditions for financing.
A note on Time Horizons
One of the challenges of working towards climate resilience is the
long-term nature of the planning needed. Adaptation pathways are
solutions to be implemented over longer periods of time (spanning
time
horizons of 50-100 years or more) in a process that starts today,
but
which not only depends on actions taken by us in the present but
also on
those taken by future generations. This thinking contrasts with the
more
typical time horizons that are usually associated with addressing
policy
problems, which, in many cases, demand immediate results and
outcomes
and apply shorter-term tools and methods. Taking a long-term
perspective
often also leads to economic and financing challenges due to the
deep
uncertainty involved in the future projections, as well as the
potential
disconnect between when investment happens to when its benefits are
reaped.
To address this issue, we take inspiration from the way in which past
generation(s) thought about their legacy. This has been called
cathedral
thinking and refers to “the undertaking of long-term projects or
goals
that are initiated for the benefit of future generations and are
destined to be completed long after the original visionaries and
builders are gone. This label represents the creation of something
that
inherently requires more time than those who design it could ever
hope
to experience themselves: that is, a way of planning that benefits
not
the designers but those who will come after them.“
How can you incorporate this way of thinking into your Climate
Resilience
Strategy? The most important point is to have a strong sense of
purpose
and a clear vision. Many of the elements of the Regional Resilience
Journey have different time frames.
Your adaptation pathways can be very long-term (e.g., up to 100
years).
The vision and the theory of change underpinning your pathway should
aim
to close the gap between long-, mid- and shorter-term results; in
that
respect, your vision should be attainable against a time horizon
that
allows for significant transformations to take place (for instance,
in
50 years’ time). In practical policy terms, your Climate Resilience
Strategy might have a mid-term ambition of 10-20 years, with your
Climate Resilience Action Plan focusing on short-term implementation
over the next 3-5 years.
What is important is to keep a strong sense of purpose and an eye on
your
long-term goals. The second important aspect is to understand that
many
of the actions that can be implemented in the short- and
medium-terms
are preparatory and will build the conditions for results in the
long-term. The key question to answer is “what should we be doing in
the
next few years to ensure we are adapting well for the long term”.
Your region will define the specific time frames for each these
components, depending on the adaptation challenges that you want to
address. We invite you to maintain a long-term perspective
throughout
implementation of the Regional Resilience Journey.
P2R deliverable templates to download:
- Pathways2Resilience Baseline Assessment Template
- Pathways2Resilience climate resilience action
plan
- Pathways2Resilience climate resilience investment
plan
- Pathways2Resilience climate resilience
strategy