Logo

A Guide to the Regional Resilience Journey (RRJ)


The Regional Resilience Journey framework provides task-by-task guidance, including methods, tools and checklists, to help regions at all maturity levels create or improve their Climate Resilience Strategies and Action Plans. It applies a systemic approach, just transition and just resilience principles and harnesses transformative innovation. Successful strategies for climate adaptation and transitioning to climate resilience combine interventions across multiple levers of change in a coherent portfolio of actions, outlining how each intervention contributes to progress to wards the desired outcomes.


Key Approaches used in the Regional Resilience Journey

Systems thinking: This approach is designed to help us grasp the interconnectedness and interdependencies of our world. It builds from the idea that none of our human interactions exist in isolation and therefore the changes applied to one part of a given system can have ripple effects in other parts of that system and those connected.

Transformative Innovation: Innovation is defined as the process of conceiving new ideas, methods, practices, or solutions that have the potential to generate a positive impact and value. For innovation to be transformative, it needs to go a step further in generating new patterns that create significant and lasting change. Systems thinking is essential for transformative innovation.

Systems change: It is an intentional process that aims at addressing the root causes of complex social and ecological issues that are often embedded in multiple interactions of cause and effect. It seeks to alter the components and structures that cause systems to behave in a certain way, with a view to establish new patterns of behaviour.

Portfolio: A portfolio approach shifts attention from the merits of individual projects to the potential for integration: facilitating synergies across and between projects to effect systemic change. The intent is to transform a place by creating an ecosystem of interventions and/or solutions.

Levers of change: These can be understood as areas of work or entry points for interventions that have the potential to unlock wide-ranging and positive change in a given place, industry or both. In the context of climate adaptation, some examples of powerful levers of change are policy, finance, technology, and citizen engagement, among others, especially if the interventions are designed following an innovation approach.

Whole-of-government approach: The approach refers to the joint activities performed by diverse ministries, public administrations and public agencies in order to provide a common solution to particular problems or issues and involve some form of cross-boundary work.

Multi-level governance: Multi-level governance refers to coordinated actions across different levels of governance from the Member States and local and regional authorities to the European Union, based on partnership and aimed at developing and implementing common policies.

Transformational climate adaptation: This approach seeks to move beyond reactive and incremental adaptation of existing systems. Instead, it seeks fostering systemic shifts that address the adaptation gap and promote long-term prosperity in the face of climate change. It delivers place-based transformation by implementing an interrelated portfolio of interventions across multiple levers of change, to drive significant and lasting societal change.

Risk-informed decision making: This approach is about making risk management related decisions in uncertain, unpredictable environments such as those that a future climate provides. It is about properly considering risks by building and weighing-up possible scenarios, consider risk drivers, and trade-offs.

The framework considers various regional circumstances and fosters integrated work on different enabling conditions to maximise institutional, social, and financial powers. Acknowledging the inter-connectiveness of different fields of work, the transformative perspective aims to look beyond climate adaptation and to identify synergies with related sectors (e.g., water management , while also strengthening collaboration and multilevel and multistakeholder engagement).

This guidance is designed to support regions in developing transformational Climate Resilience Strategies and Action Plans, focusing on the first three phases of the Regional Resilience Journey process.

A systemic approach to accelerating the transition to climate resilience

The Regional Resilience Journey framework promotes transformational adaptation by adopting a systemic approach that addresses climate resilience in its full complexity, rather than viewing it as a set of isolated issues. This approach encourages regions and communities to consider all relevant components and relationships, framing interventions holistically to shape a desirable future.

By taking a systemic perspective, regions can identify leverage points and incorporate diverse stakeholder perspectives, balancing short-term disaster risk reduction with long-term prevention and adaptation while avoiding maladaptation. The Regional Resilience Journey supports a whole-of-government and multi-level governance approach, breaking down departmental siloes and fostering meaningful stakeholder engagement at every stage of the process. This requires a foundation of transdisciplinary knowledge and data to ensure informed decision-making and collaborative action.
The Regional Resilience Journey fosters an integrated government and multi-level governance approach to support regions in work beyond departmental siloes, supports meaningful engagement of stakeholders across all relevant stages of the journey, and requires an underpinning transdisciplinary knowledge and data.

An iterative and multi-layered process

No transformative adaptation to climate resilience is linear. Therefore, allowing for experimentation, learning, and continuous iteration is crucial. The Regional Resilience Journey is designed to accommodate multiple iterations—while the phases follow a sequential logic, many of the tasks within each phase will run in parallel or in repeated cycles. Over time, regions are encouraged to undertake parts of the journey, and the journey itself, multiple times, revisiting assumptions and learning from new insights. Gaps in knowledge, data, or finance will emerge as different elements are explored, or stakeholders engaged. Strategically, it will be valuable to undergo iterations with diverse focuses, such as applying different approaches or zooming in on specific sectors.

Just Climate Resilience

The Regional Resilience Journey is designed to support regions in transitioning to climate resilience in a just and equitable manner. It integrates principles, processes, and practices to ensure distributive justice (fair allocation of burden and benefits), procedural justice (participatory decision-making processes), and recognition (respect and robust engagement with diverse cultures and perspectives), as defined by the IPCC 2022.
The IPCC stresses that just transitions need targeted and proactive measures to ensure that any negative social, environmental or economic impacts of economy-wide transitions are minimised, while benefits are maximised for those disproportionally affected.
The Regional Resilience Journey supports regions in co-designing their adaptation strategies with a participatory approach, recognising the role that vulnerable populations play in a just transition. It will help regions in enabling a governance structure that fosters a meaningful participation of relevant stakeholders (including vulnerable communities), e.g., through leveraging innovation engagements, mapping exercises, co-creation, etc.

Financing transformative adaptation

The Regional Resilience Journey approach emphasises the importance of mobilising the significant investments needed to achieve the transition to climate resilience. This increasingly demands regions to move from being applicants and recipients of public funds to being stewards of adaptation capital - leading a financial planning process to scale and target adaptation finance which makes achieving those regional transformations possible.
Therefore, and in parallel to the main Regional Resilience Journey, we have developed an Adaptation Investment Cycle to support the development of a Climate Resilience Investment Plan, which translates the ambitions into bankable projects.

The process for developing a Climate Resilience Investment Plan has been designed to encourage the financing of a region’s strategy and pathways in their entirety, whilst recognising that regions will be starting from different levels of maturity and capability. The Adaptation Investment Cycle is aligned with the main steps of the Regional Resilience Journey, meaning that certain inputs are relevant to both. They also intersect at key stages, particularly in the development and assessment of adaptation options, pathways, and action plans, where financial viability and economic performance play a crucial role in determining whether to proceed with various actions. To help clarify these connections, we have included links throughout the guide to relevant inputs and outputs that support the development of a Climate Resilience Investment Plan. A full overview of the links between the two processes can be found in Appendix B. A similar guide is provided in the finance section, illustrating how the Regional Resilience Journey aligns with the steps in the Adaptation Investment Cycle.